discussion STANDALONE LB TABLET **READABLE CLIENT** [FIXED + OPEN SOURCE]

[the_real_exo]

Preview:

---

Screenshots:

---

Download:

​

---

THIS SCRIPT SERVER SIDE IS NOT READABLE IT WILL BE UPDATED ON NEXT DAYS ONLY THE SERVER MAIN AND THE VERSION CHECK ARE CLEANED
IF YOU WANT TO CLEAN ANY CODE CONTACT ME ON DISCORD OR CONTACT "jyloz"
NOTE : THAT THIS CLEANED VERSION OF THIS SCRIPT IS NOT AVAILABLE ON ANY THREAD OR ANY LEAKING (WEBSITE OR DISCORD)
DONT FORGET TO REP AND LEAVE A GOOD COMMENT ON THIS THREAD
IF U GOT ANY ISSUE CONTACT ME FOR (ISSUE OR BROKEN LINK)​

 

[raph1556]

thanks you thanks you =)

 

[morllaines]

Please change the wrong title "open source", if its not OS

 

[the_real_exo]

Please change the wrong title "open source", if its not OS

how it's not os ?

 

[morllaines]

how it's not os ?

In the context of a FiveM script, when someone says it is open source, it means that:

• The source code is open and available: anyone can see how the script was written, without encryption or obfuscation.
• It can be modified and customized: you are free to edit the code to suit your server’s needs.

 

[the_real_exo]

In the context of a FiveM script, when someone says it is open source, it means that:

• The source code is open and available: anyone can see how the script was written, without encryption or obfuscation.
• It can be modified and customized: you are free to edit the code to suit your server’s needs.

You can really see / edit the client side and the server main.lua and vercheck is open source and i already added a disclaimer on the bottom on the thread

 

[morllaines]

If someone advertises a script as open source but in reality it is not, that is misleading. It can make people believe they are buying something with full access to the code, when in fact the code is locked or escrow-protected.
This is essentially a form of false advertising:

• The buyer expects to get the full source code to modify, customize, and verify its safety.
• If the script is not truly open source, the buyer is being deceived into paying for something different from what was promised.
• This damages trust and can be considered a dishonest or even fraudulent practice, depending on the case.

So, claiming a script is open source when it isn’t is misleading customers into buying something under false pretenses.

 

[the_real_exo]

If someone advertises a script as open source but in reality it is not, that is misleading. It can make people believe they are buying something with full access to the code, when in fact the code is locked or escrow-protected.
This is essentially a form of false advertising:

• The buyer expects to get the full source code to modify, customize, and verify its safety.
• If the script is not truly open source, the buyer is being deceived into paying for something different from what was promised.
• This damages trust and can be considered a dishonest or even fraudulent practice, depending on the case.

So, claiming a script is open source when it isn’t is misleading customers into buying something under false pretenses.

it's not locked or escrow-protected just the other server code is obfescated that you can make it cleaned with ai

 

[the_real_exo]

i think you are just talking you didn't even both the script lol
YOU ARE JUST HATING

 

[nightss]

If someone advertises a script as open source but in reality it is not, that is misleading. It can make people believe they are buying something with full access to the code, when in fact the code is locked or escrow-protected.
This is essentially a form of false advertising:

• The buyer expects to get the full source code to modify, customize, and verify its safety.
• If the script is not truly open source, the buyer is being deceived into paying for something different from what was promised.
• This damages trust and can be considered a dishonest or even fraudulent practice, depending on the case.

So, claiming a script is open source when it isn’t is misleading customers into buying something under false pretenses.

This is accurate.

i think you are just talking you didn't even both the script lol
YOU ARE JUST HATING

This is inaccurate.

If your title is wrong, just correct it - it isn’t difficult at all.

Since you mentioned you’re already cleaning the obfuscation, take the extra couple of minutes to finish the job and avoid unnecessary conflict.

Nobody appreciates the dishonesty in claiming leaks are open-sourced, even unintentional.
When you put something in the title, it sets an expectation. If you don’t meet it, that’s on you - not anyone else.

 

[the_real_exo]

This is accurate.


This is inaccurate.

If your title is wrong, just correct it - it isn’t difficult at all.

Since you mentioned you’re already cleaning the obfuscation, take the extra couple of minutes to finish the job and avoid unnecessary conflict.

Nobody appreciates the dishonesty in claiming leaks are open-sourced, even unintentional.
When you put something in the title, it sets an expectation. If you don’t meet it, that’s on you - not anyone else.

no it's right just he's talking no sense he didn't buy it he just throwing some words and he goes

 

[nightss]

no it's right just he's talking no sense he didn't buy it he just throwing some words and he goes

Ah I see, my fault for the assumption!